Legal Opinion
United States v. Rockhill
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 16, 1950No. 4957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Chief Judge.
Counsel for plaintiff filed a “petition” in this cause under Provisions 4(e) and 12 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order to serve summons outside the state under the express provisions of § 206 of the Housing and Rent Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1896, and to fix the manner of effecting service, which that statute does not prescribe, and to fix the time for answer. The Court refused the order because it was not shown under what proviso plaintiff intended to proceed. Whether personal service, substituted service or even service by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Moreno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Stella v. KaiserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Haskell v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
- Howard v. United States ex rel. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. RhoadesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1953