Legal Opinion

Blume v. Gardner

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 19, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 3934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STARR, Senior Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are members of the Israelite House of David, a religious organization, bring this action in pursuance *407of § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to review a decision of the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration, which held (1) that they were not entitled to old-age insurance benefits under the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.; and (2) that certain amounts paid to them during the years 1954 to 1958 as old-age benefits were erroneously paid, and that the United States should recover such amounts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Morrissey v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Burk-Waggoner Oil Assn. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilles v. Department of Human Resources DevelopmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Reverend Joseph J. Kleinsasser, Individually and on Behalf of Susie Kleinsasser, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Twin Oaks Community, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  4. Emily Blume v. John W. Gardner (Successor to Anthony J. Celebrezze), Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Katz v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API