Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yocum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1908No. Appeal, No. 176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal, No. 176, April T., 1908, by defendant, from order of C. P. Somerset Co., May T., 1906, No. 195, dismissing appeal from summary conviction in case of Commonwealth v. T. J. E. Yocum. Certiorari to a summary conviction for violation of a borough ordinance. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Errors assigned are set forth in the opinion of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Beaver, J.,

When this case came on to be heard, a motion was made to *239quash the appeal, for the reason (among others) that no assignments of error appeared in the paper-book of the appellant. The assignments having been filed with the prothonotary, as required by our rule, upon motion permission to print them was granted and the motion to quash overruled. The assignments were subsequently printed and the printed copy filed.

None of these assignments, however, is in accordance with our rules. The first and fourth are in flagrant violation of our rule XIY.

' The first is that, “The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. GipnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarbonoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Reap's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Township of Haverford v. ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. v. KonasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API