Reap's Appeal

Opinion by

Porter, P. J.,

The appellant was, after a hearing, adjudged by the eourt below guilty of contempt of court, in refusing to serve process by the court issued. The hearing upon the rule was held before three judges of the eourt below; there is no doubt that the court was properly organized and the defendant was present at the hearing and represented by able counsel. The court, after a hearing, adjudged the defendants, Jim Reap and John McLane, “guilty of contempt of court for their wilful disobedience of the orders of the court and their defiant refusal to execute the orders of the…