Legal Opinion

State v. Linam

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1977No. 2699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Convicted of one count of forgery by falsely making a check and one count of forgery by issuing or transferring a forged writing, all being contrary to § 40A-16-9(A) and (B), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, 1972) defendant appeals asserting: (1) that the evidence only showed an attempt to issue or transfer a forged writing; (2) the trial court erred in not giving a requested instruction on intoxication; and (3) the trial court erred in not granting a continuance.

Attempt

This issue is raised for the first time on appeal. Since it involves a question of failure of proof it…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LosollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. State v. WeberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. TookeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State v. BleaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. WatkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BarrazaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. State v. RuffinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. RhodesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API