State v. Linam
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Convicted of one count of forgery by falsely making a check and one count of forgery by issuing or transferring a forged writing, all being contrary to § 40A-16-9(A) and (B), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6, 1972) defendant appeals asserting: (1) that the evidence only showed an attempt to issue or transfer a forged writing; (2) the trial court erred in not giving a requested instruction on intoxication; and (3) the trial court erred in not granting a continuance.
Attempt
This issue is raised for the first time on appeal. Since it involves a question of failure of proof it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LosollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. WeberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. TookeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. BleaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. WatkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BarrazaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. RuffinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. RhodesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.