State v. Blea
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction of possession of heroin. The issues raised on appeal are the trial court’s asserted errors in denying (a) Motion to Suppress the Evidence for lack of probable cause, and (b) Motion for Continuance to make use of newly discovered evidence favorable to the defense. We affirm.
Motion to Suppress
Bernalillo County Sheriff’s narcotic officers Lundy and Sanchez were patrolling in a part of Albuquerque that is known as a “very high narcotic area.” Lundy had been acquainted with defendant for two or three years and knew him to be a narcotic…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. DeltenreNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. RiggsbeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HilliardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. BelcherNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. GalvanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. ZelinskeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. ClementsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.