Legal Opinion
State v. Mirabal
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1989No. 11272PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for attempting to obtain a controlled substance contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-31— 25(A)(3) (Repl.Pamp.1987). Two issues are raised on appeal: whether Section 30-31-25(A)(3) is unconstitutionally vague and whether the state failed to prove jurisdic-. tion. Because we decide these issues against defendant’s arguments, we affirm the conviction.
Defendant’s conviction was based on his attempt to fill an invalid prescription for Percodan. He moved for a directed verdict at the close of the state’s case-in-chief, arguing that the state…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LankfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Sells v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. SegottaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stinbrink v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LitteralNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ArellanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.