Legal Opinion

Windsor v. Sarsfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1912No. 9756PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered March 38, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in actions involving a disputed boundary line, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This is a suit over a disputed boundary line. In 1890, the property being owned by appellants, a fence was built a part of the way along the east boundary of the tract of land now owned by respondents. In 1893, the land was sold to a man named Cook, who began the erection of a fence along the east line, to connect with the fence already erected. He was told that the fence was east of what was perhaps the true line, and accordingly set his fence over so that, when he came to the fence that had been erected by appellants, he made a right angle turn, or as it is described, a jog of six or eight…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Turner v. CreechWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Steinhilber v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Flynn v. GlennyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Lydick v. GillNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowe v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Roe v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Morris v. Hillman Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rose v. FletcherWashington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API