Legal Opinion

Steinhilber v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1904No. 13,322PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from Dickinson district court; O. L. Moore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

AtkinsoN, J. :

This is an action in ejectment brought to recover the possession • of 16.53 acres of land in Dickinson county. In July, 1886, Frederick Eicholtz died testate. He devised to his daughters, Sarah Catharine Steinhilber and Martha Ellen Holmes, plaintiff and defendant, certain lands of which the tract in controversy is a part. George A. Rush, a brother-in-law of plaintiff and Mrs. Holmes, was appointed executor of the estate. During the greater part of the year before and for several years after the death of her father, plaintiff was absent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lecomte v. ToudouzeTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. City of Bloomington v. Bloomington Cemetery Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Edwards v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Burris v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Landrum v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Rodriguez v. La Cueva Ranch Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Spencer v. SupernoisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API