Myers v. Chamness
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County : Valjean Biddison, Judge. Proceedings by E. H. Myers, Jr., to vacate a judgment in favor of W. A. Chamness. Prom an order finding that Myers had entered his general appearance in the cause and granting him time to plead, he has appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This is an appeal from an order of thq district court of Tulsa county, made and entered upon the petition of E. H. Myers, Jr., to vacate a certain judgment in the sum of $36,750 against irm and in. favor of W. A. Chamness.
It appears that on October 5, 1921, W. A. Chamness filed suit against E. H. Myers, Jr., and Harry M. Crowe¡, to recover the sum of ,$30,000, with interest and attorney’s fee, upon a promissory note made, executed, and delivered to the plaintiff by said defendants. Summons was duly served on Crowe), but could not be served on Myers; a garnishee summons was issued and served…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Kerr v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Denton v. NoyesNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barfield Petroleum Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Richardson MacHinery Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Axelrod v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Osborn v. White Eagle Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Oklahoma Railway Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.