Rice v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Diehinson District Court. The .nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. At the October Term, 1882, of the district court, plaintiffs Rice & Floyd had judgment against defendant Simpson for $310 and costs; but judgment for costs was entered for defendants Finley, Otley, and Henry, and against plaintiffs, who bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Prior to May 3, 1879, plaintiffs furnished to Barclay Simpson lumber and materials in the sum of $249.30, to be used in the construction of a dwelling house on lot 8, in block 12, in Kinney & Hodge’s addition to the city of Abilene, and the lumber and material were used in the construction of the dwelling house. This was completed May 3, 1879, and a lien for material filed soon after. At the time the contract for furnishing the lumber and material was made, and at the time the same were furnished and used, the title to the lot on which…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Bell v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Morrissey v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Challis v. HartloffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
- Wood v. DillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896