Commonwealth v. Perfetto, M., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baer
In a published opinion, a splintered, en banc panel of the Superior Court concluded that Subsection 110(1)(ii) of Pennsylvania's compulsory joinder statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 110(1)(ii), does not preclude the Philadelphia District Attorney (the "Commonwealth") from prosecuting Marc Perfetto ("Appellant") on pending misdemeanor criminal charges that arose from the same criminal episode that resulted in Appellant also being charged with a summary traffic offense, despite the fact that the Commonwealth already had prosecuted Appellant for that summary traffic offense. Commonwealth v. Perfetto , 169…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Com. v. Johnson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Banks, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Atkinson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Jefferson, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.