Legal Opinion
People v. Willis
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 1973No. Docket 13237PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
Defendant David Willis and Clarence Williams 1 were convicted by a jury of armed robbery. MCLA 750.529; MSA 28.797. Defendant appeals in propria persona.
The facts surrounding the commission of the robbery of the Alaska Fur Store in Grand Rapids were carefully set out by Judge Holbrook in People v Clarence Williams, 39 Mich App 234 (1972). Because defendant raises other issues, we set out the facts surrounding the events leading to the arrest of both subjects in detail.
In the early morning hours of the day following the commission of the crime in Grand Rapids, an Ohio state trooper observed a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. JewellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. McDougalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Robinson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.