State v. McDougal
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issues raised on this appeal deal only with the existence and validity of an “inventory search.” There is no attempt by the state to justify the intrusion into the automobile as a consent search, a search incident to arrest, a probable cause search, an exigent circumstances search, or anything other than an inventory search. The record clearly indicates that due to the lack of consent, the time and place of the intrusion, and the general lack of any other mitigating circumstances, no other justification can arguably be found.
The state contends that an inventory of a motor vehicle is not a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. ProberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MonahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. RothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. CallawayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.