Legal Opinion

Dockery v. City of Norton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 2, 1963No. Record 5650PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, C. J.

Phyllis Dockery, an infant twelve years of age, suing by her father and next friend, filed a motion for judgment against the City of Norton to recover damages for injuries received by her while playing or climbing on a large drainage pipe which the city had stored, in anticipation of its installation, on a grass plot between the sidewalk and curb on one of its streets. The motion alleged that as the plaintiff climbed on the pipe it rolled and crushed her leg between that and another pipe. It was further alleged that the accident and the plaintiff’s injuries were proximately caused by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  2. Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Townley v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Mayor of Hagerstown v. HertzlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Selfe v. HaleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of CentraliaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Barnette v. DickensSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  3. City of Richmond v. HoltSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API