Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1919PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Chancery Court of city of Norfolk in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

' Whitehurst sued the Norfolk and Western Railway Company for a personal injury and recovered a judgment for $15,000.00, which the trial court refused to set aside, and to that judgment this writ of error was awarded.

[1] Whitehurst had been employed as a fireman on a yard engine of the railway company, on its yard in the city of Norfolk for about a year prior to his injury, though he had worked only “a few nights” on that part of the yard on which hé was injured. There are a number of tracks on the yard, and at the switch-point of each track connecting the siding with the lead track there is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Boldt v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Hill v. WinsorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Blondel v. HaysSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Scott v. SimmsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  4. Sheila Ilina Boland, Etc. v. J. Spencer LoveCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  5. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API