City of Richmond v. Holt
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
In this appeal of a judgment in favor of a plaintiff in a personal injury action, the primary issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive notice to a municipality of a defect in a municipal right-of-way adjoining a public street.
We state the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Junne-Anne Holt, the prevailing party in the trial court. Tashman v. Gibbs, 263 Va. 65, 68, 556 S.E.2d 772, 774 (2002); City of Bedford v. Zimmerman, 262 Va. 81, 83, 547 S.E.2d 211, 212 (2001). At a jury trial, the evidence showed that Holt sustained injuries when she fell…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Votsis v. Ward's Coffee Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- City of Bedford v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Tashman v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
- City of Portsmouth v. HousemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Commonwealth v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Jenkins v. Bay House Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Smith v. IrvingSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Donald Baruch v. Starwood Hotels & ResortsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019