Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Holt

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 7, 2002No. Record 011742PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal of a judgment in favor of a plaintiff in a personal injury action, the primary issue is whether the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive notice to a municipality of a defect in a municipal right-of-way adjoining a public street.

We state the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Junne-Anne Holt, the prevailing party in the trial court. Tashman v. Gibbs, 263 Va. 65, 68, 556 S.E.2d 772, 774 (2002); City of Bedford v. Zimmerman, 262 Va. 81, 83, 547 S.E.2d 211, 212 (2001). At a jury trial, the evidence showed that Holt sustained injuries when she fell…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Votsis v. Ward's Coffee Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. City of Bedford v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Tashman v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  4. City of Portsmouth v. HousemanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Commonwealth v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Jenkins v. Bay House Associates, L.P.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Smith v. IrvingSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  4. Donald Baruch v. Starwood Hotels & ResortsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API