Legal Opinion
Zucker v. After Six, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 7, 2006No. 05-3347UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, Circuit Judge.
The defendant, After Six, Inc., appeals the district court’s order denying its mo tion to stay this diversity wrongful termination action pending arbitration and therefore permitting the proceedings to move forward. We are satisfied that the parties’ dispute is not governed by the arbitration provision of their expired independent sales representative agreement, and therefore, we will AFFIRM.
I
In 1981, the plaintiff, Morris Zucker, began working as a sales representative for Superior Pant Company and continued in that capacity when the company became After Six, in about…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cynthia Huffman v. The Hilltop CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Koch v. Compucredit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- W & T Travel Services, LLC v. Priority One Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Kasie Stevens-Bratton v. TruGreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.