Legal Opinion
State v. Rosecliff Realty Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 7, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This the plaintiff's appeal from a judgment for defendants entered in the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the County of Bergen.
Harold O. Cox and Melba Valle brought suit, in the name of the State, against the defendants under the Civil Rights statute,R.S. 10:1-1 et seq. A voluntary non-suit was taken in the Cox action and therefore we are not concerned therewith.
The amended state of demand set forth that the plaintiff, a negress, on June 29, 1947 purchased an admission ticket to Palisades Amusement Park; that thereafter she caused to be bought a ticket to the swimming pool…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stukey v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Snegon v. Consolidated, C., Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Baker v. SoltauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Karch v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. Alto-Reste Park Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Valle v. StengelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Underhill v. AnciauxNevada Supreme Court · 1951
- Highpoint at Lakewood Condominium Association, Inc. v. TheNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- State ex rel. O.G.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.