Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von Stetina
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
474 So.2d 783 (1985)
FLORIDA PATIENT's COMPENSATION FUND, et al., Appellants
v.
Susan Ann VON STETINA, Etc., et al., Appellees.
Nos. 64237, 64251 and 64252.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 16, 1985.
Rehearing Denied August 29, 1985.
Talbot D'Alemberte, Charles W. Ehrhardt, Richard B. Collins of Perkins and Collins, Tallahassee and Jeffrey B. Crockett and Samuel J. Dubbin of Steel, Hector and Davis, Miami, for Florida Patient's Compensation Fund.
William H. Lefkowitz and David M. Orshefsky of Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster and Russell, Fort Lauderdale, Steven R. Berger and Bernard and Mauro, Miami,…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Boyd; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Boyd; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Overton; Concurrence; Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Smith v. Department of Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- University of Miami v. EcharteSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- In Re Asbestos Litigation. Appeal of Raymark Industries, Inc. In No. 86-5236. In Re Asbestos Litigation. Danfield v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., Etc., Appeal of Owens-Illinois, Inc., Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh-Corning Corporation, the Celotex Corporation, Armstrong Cork Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, and Fibreboard Corporation, in No. 86-5237. In Re Asbestos Litigation. John W. Gregory and Zelda F. Gregory, His Wife, Zelda F. Gregory, Administratrix and Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of John W. Gregory, Deceased Zelda F. Gregory, Individually and Brian Gregory, a Minor by His Natural Parent and Guardian Zelda F. Gregory v. General Motors Corporation, Joseph Doe, Tom Doe, Harry Doe, Robert Doe, Ken Doe, Daniel Doe, Larry Doe, Edward Doe, Sam Doe, Jack Doe, Fred Doe, Vince Doe. Appeal of General Motors Corporation, in No. 86-5370Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.