Legal Opinion

Town of Monticello v. Finlayson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 16, 1945PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.:

Appellant contends that the decree appealed from should be reversed because it is contrary to the opinion and judgment of this Court on the prior appeal (154 Fla. 274, 17 So. (2nd) 84) in that said decree failed to allow any interest on the assessments against the property of appellees.

The main question presented on this appeal is the contention of appellees that the decree appealed from should be affirmed because the provision of Chapter 9298, Laws of 1923, authorizing interest on assessments against property benefitted by municipal improvements is not within the title of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Ex Parte PrichaSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Badgett v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HazelSupreme Court of Florida · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. RouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  2. State v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Farabee v. Board of Trustees, Lee County Law Lib.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Purk v. Federal Press Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API