State v. Pierson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Justice.
This is an appeal from defendant’s conviction for the crime of attempted robbery, and sentence of a term not less than fifteen nor more than twenty years in the state penitentiary. Defendant contends that certain comments made by the prosecu tor during his closing argument amounted to a comment on defendant’s failure to take the stand, and thus constituted reversible error.
The particular statements objected to were: (1) “Now the defendant hasn’t said, I didn’t do it,” and (2) “The only man in the world besides the defendant that can testify as to whether he was there or not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- Morrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Oldham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ArredondoArizona Supreme Court · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.