Legal Opinion

State v. Pierson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1967No. 1712PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

This is an appeal from defendant’s conviction for the crime of attempted robbery, and sentence of a term not less than fifteen nor more than twenty years in the state penitentiary. Defendant contends that certain comments made by the prosecu tor during his closing argument amounted to a comment on defendant’s failure to take the stand, and thus constituted reversible error.

The particular statements objected to were: (1) “Now the defendant hasn’t said, I didn’t do it,” and (2) “The only man in the world besides the defendant that can testify as to whether he was there or not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Morrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Oldham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. PearsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. ArredondoArizona Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API