Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1967No. Appeal, 208PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Roberts,

This appeal presents to our Court for the first time a problem concerning the application of the new rule on constitutional harmless error announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824 (1967).

Appellant, Oscar E. Pearson, was charged with aggravated robbery on eleven bills of indictment. After a jury trial in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County, verdicts of guilty were returned on all eleven bills; the trial judge imposed consecutive five to ten year sentences on eight of the eleven…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. BloseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. MartinolichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. PadgettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Derrington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API