Legal Opinion

Bishop & Co. v. Williams

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, C.J.

This is an action on a promissory note wbicb in words and figures is as follows:

“$3000. “Honolulu, Nov. 19, 1891.
“ Twelve months after date we promise to pay the order “of C. E. Williams and J. H. Wood three thousand dollars *300“in U. S. gold coin at the bank of Bishop & Co. with interest “ at 10 per cent, per annum. Yalue received.
“H. H. Williams & Co.”

Endorsed on back — “C. E. Williams, J. H. Wood.”

This note was the property of the plaintiffs by endorsement and delivery. Before maturity J. H. Wood, one of the endorsers, died and the defendants Waterhouse and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Hallet v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Goodnow v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuakini Hospital & Home v. YamanohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kuakini Hospital & Home v. YamanohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API