Legal Opinion
Bishop & Co. v. Williams
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Exceptions.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, by
Judd, C.J.
This is an action on a promissory note wbicb in words and figures is as follows:
“$3000. “Honolulu, Nov. 19, 1891.
“ Twelve months after date we promise to pay the order “of C. E. Williams and J. H. Wood three thousand dollars *300“in U. S. gold coin at the bank of Bishop & Co. with interest “ at 10 per cent, per annum. Yalue received.
“H. H. Williams & Co.”
Endorsed on back — “C. E. Williams, J. H. Wood.”
This note was the property of the plaintiffs by endorsement and delivery. Before maturity J. H. Wood, one of the endorsers, died and the defendants Waterhouse and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Hallet v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Goodnow v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kuakini Hospital & Home v. YamanohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Kuakini Hospital & Home v. YamanohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1961