Legal Opinion

Kuakini Hospital & Home v. Yamanoha

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1961No. 4121Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

LEWIS, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a summary judgment dismissing the action on the ground that plaintiff's *91averred claim, for “hospitalization, services rendered and supplies furnished by plaintiff to the deceased,” Hr. Richard A. Yamanoha, is barred by the nonclaim statute, R.L.H. 1955, § 317-23. That statute provides that any claim “not presented within four months from the first day of publication of the notice [to creditors], * * * shall be forever barred and the executor or administrator shall not be authorized to pay it.”

Dr. Yamanoha died on August 21,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. LoveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Roth v. RavichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Horicon v. Estate of LangloisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  5. In Re Williamson's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API