Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cantina Grill, JV v. City & County of Denver County Board of Equalization Ex Rel. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 16, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 12SC819Published

1DissentJustice Eid

{82 The majority holds that the Concessionaires' possessory interests are taxable because they meet the three-part test of Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc., 19 P.3d 1263 (Colo. 2001). I have no issue with the majority's recitation of the three factors, including the independence prong, which requires "an interest that provides a revenue-generating capability to the private owner independent of the government property owner." Id. at 1279. The problem with the majority's opinion is that it simply applies the three-factor test without fleshing out what the test is meant to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. LiggettSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API