People v. Liggett

{ 1 In this interlocutory appeal pursuant to CAR. 4.1, we consider whether the trial court should have suppressed statements that Defendant-Appellee Mr. Ari Liggett made to investigators during an interview on October 17, 2012. The trial court suppressed the majority of the statements that Liggett made during this interview because it found that they were involuntary. We, however, hold that, when considering the totality of the cireumstances, the investigators never overbore Liggett's will, and thus his statements were voluntary. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's suppression order and…