Legal Opinion

Harper Ex Rel. Harper v. Poway Unified School District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 4, 2004No. 04CV1103 JAH(POR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) ] [DOC. # 14] AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [DOC. # 18]

HOUSTON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Now before the Court are defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. After careful consideration of the pleadings and relevant exhibits submitted, and for the reasons set forth below, this Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendants’ motion to dismiss and DENIES plaintiffs…

2Cases cited86 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Summit Media LLC v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CADistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  2. Harper v. Poway Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
  3. Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. Julio F.V. v. Christopher Chestnut, in official capacity as Warden of California City Detention Facility, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API