Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 424.] SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London,
2024-Ohio-5773.] Insurance—Insurers of paint company that marketed and sold lead paint are not obligated to indemnify paint company for payments that paint company made into abatement fund to mitigate hazards of lead paint—Because abatement-fund payment was made to prevent future harm rather than compensate for past harm, payment was not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Sharonville v. American Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonOhio Supreme Court · 2024