State v. Hill
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendants first contend that the trial court committed reversible error by “allowing the issue of race to dominate the defendants’ trial” and by questioning various witnesses in a manner which defendants argue violated their right to a fair trial. Both defendants are black males and the victim, Jay Priddyman, was a white male. Throughout the trial, the prosecutor repeatedly referred to Priddyman as “the white man” and the trial judge also referenced the victim by color on two occasions. It is important to note that defendant Ricky Hill’s attorney also referred to Mr.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- United States v. Milton L. McCaskillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Handy v. PPG IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002