Legal Opinion

Midbrook Flowerbulbs Holland B v. v. Holland America Bulb Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 2017No. 14-36085PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge:

After the collapse of the Dutch Tulip Bubble of 1637, we’ve heard little about that flower’s market. But it hasn’t gone away.

This action grows out of a family business dispute: The Dutch shipper of tulip bulbs to his brother in America claims his brother shorted him. The dispute was litigated at three court levels in Holland. The shipper won. Now he comes to Seattle to enforce his judgment. Enforce it the district court did. The American importer-buyer appeals that judgment. He will lose.

I. Background

A. Factual Background

' Holland America Bulb Farms, Inc. (“Holland…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Inteliclear, LLC v. Etc Global HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Keo Ratha v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Djeneba Sidibe v. Sutter HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. Etchegaray Farms, LLC v. Lehr Bros., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  5. (PC) Johnson v. IbrahimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API