Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Edgefield Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Before Purdy, J., Edgefield, November term, 1904. Action by A. H. Jennings against Edgefield Manufacturing Co. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals on following" exceptions: “1. Excepts because his Honor erred in charging the jury that ‘it was the duty of the defendant company to keep the means and appliances and machinery in proper condition, to keep' them in proper repair;’ whereas, he should have charged the jury that it was the duty of the defendant company to…

Read the full summary

Before Purdy, J., Edgefield, November term, 1904. Action by A. H. Jennings against Edgefield Manufacturing Co. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals on following" exceptions: “1. Excepts because his Honor erred in charging the jury that ‘it was the duty of the defendant company to keep the means and appliances and machinery in proper condition, to keep' them in proper repair;’ whereas, he should have charged the jury that it was the duty of the defendant company to furnish proper machinery and appliances to the engineer, to plaintiff herein, to- enable him to operate the machinery;…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff, who was. an engineer at defendant’s mill in charge at night of the engine and boiler and of the pipes attached to them, was injured while going from' the engine to the pump' by stepping into a pool of hot water made by the breaking of a defective underground pipe. The judgment was. for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

Gardner, master mechanic of the mill, under whom plaintiff worked, testified his own duties “were to' keep up the machinery and to’ see that everythingawas in running condition.” His testimony, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowrimore v. Palmer Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Chase v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Edgefield Mfg. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Newell Contracting Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Elms v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Sturdyvin v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  5. Horn v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API