Legal Opinion

Sturdyvin v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 4, 1914No. 8867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Before Sitipp, J., Greenville, March, 1913. Action by John M. Sturdyvin against the Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Company. From a judgment for complainant, defendant appeals. cite: As to alleged negligence in not providing a handrail and running board on the side of tender: 1 Labatt, M. & S., secs. 35, 13; 78 S. C. 481; 30 Am.

Read the full summary

Before Sitipp, J., Greenville, March, 1913. Action by John M. Sturdyvin against the Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Railway Company. From a judgment for complainant, defendant appeals. cite: As to alleged negligence in not providing a handrail and running board on the side of tender: 1 Labatt, M. & S., secs. 35, 13; 78 S. C. 481; 30 Am. Rep. 661; 136 Mass. 84; 86 S. C. 271; 83 S. C. 224; 71 S. C. 58; 65 S. C. 194; 67 S. C. 136; 38 S. C. 199; 66 S. C. 302; 138 Fed. 6; 140 Fed. 568; 60 S. C. 153; 61 S. C. 488; 72 S. C. 421; 74 S. C. 143, 234; 76 S. C. 286. As to alleged negligence in not warning…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice; Hydricic.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for $5,000 damages for personal injuries sustained while assisting, as a brakeman, in operating a switch engine in defendant’s yard at Greenyille, S. C., by attempting to mount said engine when it was in motion. The engine was provided with two steps, sometimes called running boards, at the front, on each side of the drawhead, and two on the rear of the tender, similarly placed. The steps were about 12 inches wide and three feet long, with backstops about six inches high. They…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Youngblood v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  3. Jennings v. Edgefield Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Lowrimore v. Palmer Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Fitzgerald v. Langley Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eargle v. Sumter Lighting Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Montgomery v. National Convoy & Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Horne v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Rogers v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Mullinax v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API