Change of Water Rights of the Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. City of Aspen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
The water court entered a decree permitting The Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal Company (here called the Company) to change the nature of use of water rights from direct flow and storage for irrigation purposes to direct flow and storage for irrigation, domestic, commercial, industrial, municipal and all beneficial purposes. The City of Aspen, the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County and the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District took this appeal. We affirm.
The record in this case contains 3741 folios. The exhibits fill a fair-sized carton. The water court’s findings of fact,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Twin Lakes Reservoir & Canal Co. v. City of AspenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- Danielson v. Kerbs Ag., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- City of Thornton v. Clear Creek Water Users AllianceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- STATE DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES, ETC. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.