Grand Valley Water Users Ass'n v. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Rice
¶74 The majority concludes that the water court erred when it: (1) concluded that stor*471age of the Busk-Ivanhoe rights on the eastern slope prior to use was lawful; (2) included the volumes of exported water paid as rental fees for storage on the eastern slope in its historic consumptive use quantification of the water rights; and (3) concluded that it was required to exclude the twenty-two years of undecreed use of the subject water rights from the representative study period. Maj. op. ¶¶ 7-9. In my view, however, the storage on the eastern slope prior to use'was lawful because it was within…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Tonko v. MallowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- City of Florence v. Board of Waterworks of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Burlington Ditch Reservoir & Land Co. v. Metro Wastewater Reclamation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.