Legal Opinion

Roberts & Johnson Lumber Co. v. Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1950No. 167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether the evidence suffices to overcome the demurrer. The trial court thought not, and we agree.

It is clear that under tbe decisions in Rose v. Davis, 188 N.C. 355, 124 S.E. 576, and Payne v. Flack, 152 N.C. 600, 68 S.E. 16, tbe plaintiffs can enforce no lien against tbe building for materials furnished tbe contractor. Tbe owners paid in advance for more than what tbe contractor bad earned up to tbe time be quit tbe job, and at no time thereafter was be entitled to further compensation under bis agreement. This defeats tbe plaintiffs’ lien. Dixon v. Ipock, 212…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Rose v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Payne & Decker Bros. v. FlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Brown v. Burlington Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Dixon v. IpockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fletcher, Barnhardt & White, Inc. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API