Rose v. . Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
Tbe pertinent facts, established by tbe verdict or not disputed, are as follows:
1. During tbe year 1920, tbe feme defendant, Mrs. Clyde N. Davis, and one Samuel Abbott were tbe owners and tenants in common of a lot of land in tbe town of LaGrange, N. C.
2. As owners they entered into a contract with L. F. Davis, -husband of tbe feme defendant, and a contractor by trade, to erect a theatre building on said lot at and for tbe agreed price of $15,000.00, paying for tbe same in advance.
3. Some of tbe materials used in tbe construction of this building were purchased from tbe plaintiff by tbe…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Southern Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Ingold v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Morganton Hardware Co. v. Morganton Graded SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Orinoco Supply Co. v. Masonic & Eastern Star HomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Noland Co. v. . TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- North Carolina Lumber Co. v. Spear Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Mfg. Co. v. . BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Honeycutt v. . Kenilworth Development Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.