Legal Opinion

Rose v. . Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1924PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Tbe pertinent facts, established by tbe verdict or not disputed, are as follows:

1. During tbe year 1920, tbe feme defendant, Mrs. Clyde N. Davis, and one Samuel Abbott were tbe owners and tenants in common of a lot of land in tbe town of LaGrange, N. C.

2. As owners they entered into a contract with L. F. Davis, -husband of tbe feme defendant, and a contractor by trade, to erect a theatre building on said lot at and for tbe agreed price of $15,000.00, paying for tbe same in advance.

3. Some of tbe materials used in tbe construction of this building were purchased from tbe plaintiff by tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Southern Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Ingold v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Morganton Hardware Co. v. Morganton Graded SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Orinoco Supply Co. v. Masonic & Eastern Star HomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Noland Co. v. . TrusteesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. North Carolina Lumber Co. v. Spear Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Mfg. Co. v. . BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BlaylockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Honeycutt v. . Kenilworth Development Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API