State Ex Rel. Werlein v. Elamore
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The legislature provided that in initiating paternity proceedings under sec. 52.24, Stats., the court should interrogate the mother of the child as to “the place where such child was begotten.” Such inquiry was not made in the case at bar, and a timely motion for dismissal was made; we must determine whether this flaw is fatal. This in turn will depend on whether the legislative language is found to be mandatory or only directory. We conclude it is the latter and therefore affirm the trial court’s refusal to dismiss the action.
The place where the mother claims that the conception occurred may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. White v. SimpsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- George Williams College v. Village of Williams BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Worachek v. Stephenson Town School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Appleton v. Outagamie CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. RosenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Eby v. KozarekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.