Legal Opinion

Goetz v. Black

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1932No. Docket No. 127, Calendar Nos. 35,722-35,739PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Alfred Goetz and 17 other plaintiffs have each brought an independent suit against Edward D. Black, defendant, to recover a statutory penalty. For the piirpose of appeal only, the 18 cases have been consolidated and considered as one. Each plaintiff claims that after being arrested and illegally detained for several days in the Genesee county jail, he caused, oh the 10th day of July, 1930, a petition for habeas corpus in legal and proper form to be presented to defendant, one of the circuit judges of Genesee county, and that defendant refused to grant the petition and order the issuance of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Click v. ClickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Grier v. Kansas City, Clay County & St. Joseph Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  5. In re JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1867

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Forfeiture of $5,264Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tail v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Tingley v. KortzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In Re Certified Question From US District CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. McCagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API