Legal Opinion

St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 28, 1989No. C5-88-2392PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*667OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant St. Paul Companies, Inc., challenges the trial court’s October 25, 1988, judgment dismissing the action on the ground that the statute providing for de novo review is unconstitutional. We affirm the trial court and accept jurisdiction to review the matter pursuant to the MAPA.

FACTS

Respondent Alleghany Corp. applied to the Commissioner of the Department of Commerce, as required by Minn.Stat. § 60D.02, for approval to purchase 10 percent or more of the voting stock of St. Paul Companies (SPC). After conducting significant discovery, the parties participated in an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wegan v. Village of LexingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Guilliams v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Head v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. State ex rel. Young v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. HatchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API