State ex rel. Young v. Brill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order from the supreme court upon relation of Edward T. Young, attorney general, requiring Hascal R. Brill, William Louis Kelly, Olin B. Lewis, George L. Bunn, Grier Orr and Oscar Hallam, as judges of the Second judicial district of the state of Minnesota, to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not be issued commanding them to appoint a member of the board of control of Ramsey county.
1Opinion of the Court
On April 1, 1907, the following opinion was filed:
2Per curiam
The relator, the attorney general of the state, applied to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel the judges of the district court of the Second judicial district of the state to appoint a member of the board of control of Ramsey county, as provided by Sp. Laws 1883, p. 189, c. 51. An order to show cause why the writ should not issue was made, and upon the return the respondents appeared and moved to discharge the order and dismiss the proceedings upon the ground that the statute which assumed to impose the duty of making such appointment…
3Cases cited75 opinions
- Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. FerreiraSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by36 opinions
- State v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Sibert v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.