Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chaminade Velours, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

TMs is a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment heretofore issued on the ground that all of the causes of action joined in the complaint herein do not authorize the issuance of the warrant of attachment. There are five causes of action pleaded; the first four causes of action are such as come within the provisions of section 902 of the Civil Practice Act, being predicated upon contract, express or implied, and to recover a sum of money only; the fifth cause of action is of an equitable nature, being a suit to set aside and to declare fraudulent and void as against the plaintiff a transfer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. Lake & Export Coal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Grassi v. La Sociedad Bancaria Del ChimborazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Brown v. Chaminade Velours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. Reitmeister v. ReitmeisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Levin v. FrankNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Republic of Italy v. De AngelisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API