Legal Opinion

Reitmeister v. Reitmeister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vooehis, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying her motion to vacate a warrant of attachment. The action, husband against wife, is mainly to recover a balance of money which plaintiff alleges he delivered to her for necessaries for the household. The complaint contains a second cause of action to replevin two wrist watches and a United States war bond alleged to belong to him. Manifestly, an action in replevin is not one to recover a sum of money only, so that attachment based upon that cause of action will not lie (Civ. Prac. Act, § 902). Defendant moves to set aside this warrant of attachment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Zenith Bathing Pavilion, Inc. v. Fair Oaks Steamship Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Brown v. Chaminade Velours, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Olsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. MacMurray v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Worldwide Carriers, Ltd. v. Aris Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Leland v. MorinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Fawick Corp. v. Alfa Export Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Reeder v. Mastercraft Electronics Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Commissioner of Social Services v. W.L.New York City Family Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API