Legal Opinion
Barnhill v. Veneman
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2008No. Nos. 07-1145, 07-1146PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge FLOYD joined.
OPINION
KING, Circuit Judge:
These appeals relate to lawsuits being pursued by several classes of peanut farmers (the “Farmers”) who insured their 2002 peanut crops under a Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Policy (the “MPCI Policy”) that, under federal law, was issued by private insurers and reinsured by the Government.1 After suffering heavy losses to their 2002 peanut crops, due primarily to a severe drought during the growing season, the Farmers filed claims under the MPCI…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mongold v. WoodsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- In Re Peanut Crop Ins. LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- McDonnel, Thomas EltonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Slaey v. Harrington (In re Slaey)District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015