Legal Opinion
Coy v. City of Tulsa
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 8, 1933No. 1566PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this action in the District Court of Tulsa county, Okl., to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of the closing of North Maybelle avenue between Cameron and Easton streets within the city of Tulsa. The cause was removed to this court by the defendant Missouri, Kansas & Texas-Railroad Company, a corporation. Defendants have separately demurred to the plaintiff’s petition on the common ground that no cause of action is stated. The petition discloses that the plaintiff is the, owner of lots 6, 7, and 8, Owen…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vacation of Part of Town of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Erickson v. HorlykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- In re HullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Spang & Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- State Highway Commission v. LA REYNOLDS COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Tidewater Construction Corp. v. ManlySupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
- Gruntorad v. Hughes BrothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.