Legal Opinion

State v. O'Brien

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 17, 2013No. 2012AP1769-CR, 2012AP1770-CR, 2012P1863-CR; 2012AP1863-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. The newly enacted Wis. Stat. § 970.038 (2011-12)1 makes hearsay evidence admissible at a criminal defendant's preliminary examination and permits the probable cause determination and bindover decision at a preliminary examination to be based "in whole or in part" on hearsay evidence. We accepted these consolidated interlocutory appeals to consider whether these provisions violate a criminal defendant's constitutional rights to confront adversary witnesses, compel testimony by favorable witnesses, and have the effective assistance of counsel.

¶ 2. Because the purpose of a preliminary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. Teixeira / Commonwealth v. MeadeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  4. Counsil (Joshua) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. Charles E. ButtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API