Legal Opinion

State v. Hull

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 19, 2015No. 2014AP365-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHruz, J.

¶ 1. David Hull appeals a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss charges arising *609from an alleged sexual assault of a minor.1 At the preliminary hearing, the alleged victim's statements were introduced through the testimony of an investigating detective. The testimony was offered pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 970.038, a recently enacted statute that authorizes the admission of hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings.2

¶ 2. Hull contends Wis. Stat. § 970.038 is an unconstitutional ex post facto law, and he also argues the preliminary hearing was improperly terminated without Hull being allowed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API