State v. Hull
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtHruz, J.
¶ 1. David Hull appeals a nonfinal order denying his motion to dismiss charges arising *609from an alleged sexual assault of a minor.1 At the preliminary hearing, the alleged victim's statements were introduced through the testimony of an investigating detective. The testimony was offered pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 970.038, a recently enacted statute that authorizes the admission of hearsay evidence at preliminary hearings.2
¶ 2. Hull contends Wis. Stat. § 970.038 is an unconstitutional ex post facto law, and he also argues the preliminary hearing was improperly terminated without Hull being allowed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015