In re Appeal of Martin
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
The issue in this case is that of whether the transcript of the hearing conducted by a municipality subject to the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. §10101 et seq., required to be certified as part of the record on the landowner’s appeal to common pleas, must be prepared at the expense of the municipality or at the expense of the landowner.
The West Hempfield Township, Lancaster County, Board of Supervisors conducted hearings in the mat*305ter of Naomi I. Martin’s challenge to the validity of, and request for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Petrash GuardianshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Kreitz v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Appeal of CrossleyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- In Re Appeal by Mark-Garner Associates, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- McIntyre v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Readinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.