Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Board of Supervisors

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1992No. 2227 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALLADINO, Judge.

Charles and Martha McIntyre (Landowners) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Pike County (trial court) which directed Landowners to bring their property into compliance with the Shohola Township Zoning Ordinance.

Landowners own lakefront property in the Twin Lakes area of Shohola Township (Township), Pike County. 1 In 1987, Landowners built a platform-like structure on their property. Landowners neither applied for a permit to build the structure, nor requested a variance from the Township. At the time the structure was built, Section 1308 of the Shohola…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Appeal of MartinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Carol Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Quaker City Yacht Club v. WilliamsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Odd Fellows Home of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Readinger v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Lower Paxton Township v. OkonieskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Airport Professional Office Center 100 Condominium Ass'n v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Alpha Auto Sales, Inc. v. Department of State, Bureau of Professional & Occupational AffairsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API