Legal Opinion
Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. Bragalini
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1958PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGtvern, J.
In this action for a declaratory judgment, instituted by the plaintiff taxpayer, the defendants, constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York, move before answer to dismiss the complaint, (1) for want of jurisdiction of the subject matter, and (2) for failure to state a cause of action. It is the prime contention of the defendants that the State of New York is the real party in interest and that it has not consented to be sued.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a Delaware corporation operating omnibuses which transport passengers in interstate commerce, and hence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- National City Bank of NY v. Republic of ChinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Commuters Association v. LevittDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Hickmann v. WujickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Lowenbraun v. McKeonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Ammex-Champlain Corp. v. GallmanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1973
- Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. v. BragaliniNew York Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.